Legal Opinion

Bergstrom v. Noah

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1999No. 79,531PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Roger McCartney, d/b/a Stockman’s Livestock Exchange and Charlene McCartney, (the McCartneys) through their attorneys, Don W. Noah and Noah and Harrison, P.A., (Noah), filed a Kansas antitrust action against Marvin and Marilyn Bergstrom, Ben and Karen Dreesen, and Farmers Livestock Commission Co., Inc.,- (the FLCC parties) in the District Court of Republic County, Kansas. This underlying antitrust action was resolved by summary judgment against the McCartneys. The FLCC parties then filed a malicious prosecution action against the McCartneys…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Hunt v. DresieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Saliba v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Hawley v. Kansas Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API