Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 2002No. 14-00-00391-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal by National Convenience Stores, Inc. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, from summary judgment rulings and a bench trial. Appellants challenge (1) the award to appellee of the proceeds of an insurance policy National Convenience Stores held on the lives of its employees, (2) the court’s findings at the bench trial on attorney’s fees and the applicability of Texas Insurance Code article 21.55, and (3) prejudgment interest. Lloyd’s additionally argues that it should not be held jointly and severally liable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  3. Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. CERTAIN UNDERWR. AT LLOYD'S LONDON v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API