Legal Opinion

Bocquet v. Herring

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1998No. 96-1241PublishedCited by 1,266 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, SPECTOR, OWEN, ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, join.

The Declaratory Judgments Act provides that in any proceeding under the Act “the court may award costs and reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees as are equitable and just.” Tex. Civ. Pbac. & Rem.Code § 37.009. The question here is, by what standard is such an award of attorney fees to be reviewed on appeal.

Earl Herring and his wife sued two groups of defendants, the Boequet parties and the Weyel parties, for a judgment declaring that defendants were not entitled to access then-property by means…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,266 opinions

  1. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004

1,261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API