Legal Opinion

Lexington Insurance Company v. Paddock Swimming Pool Company

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 1, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-3131Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-3131 (GMH) ) PADDOCK SWIMMING POOL CO., ) et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) ) PADDOCK SWIMMING POOL CO., ) ) Cross Claimant, ) ) v. ) ) P&F SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Cross Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this contract and negligence action, Plaintiffs are seven insurance companies (Lexington Insurance Co., Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co., Aspen…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Steele v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API