Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 3, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-3041Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROGELIO A. STANFORD, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23 - 3041 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rogelio Stanford brings this action against Howard University alleging that his application for the role of lieutenant at the university’s Department of Public Safety was denied due to his race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Howard seeks summary judgment, arguing that Mr. Stanford was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Holbrook, Dawnele v. Reno, JanetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.