Robinson v. Peru Plow & Wheel Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error to the District Court of Kingfisher County, Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge. Action by the Peru Plow & Wheel Co., against Samuel F. Robinson and Clarence L. Gibson' to recover damages for the alleged conversion of a stock of farming implements. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
GREEN, C. J.:
This was an action of trover and conversion, in the district court of Kingfisher county», brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover damages for the alleged conversion of a stock of farming implements, consisting of plows, harrows and cultivators, and of the value of something; more than two thousand dollars. A trial was had at the October term, 1890, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant in error for the sum of nineteen hundred dollars and costs of suit. The plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hepburn & Dundas v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- The Corporation of New-Orleans v. WinterSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Gon-Shay-EeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Fleming v. HartrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Dorman v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. IISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.