Dorman v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grant County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by James Dorman against the Connecticut Eire Insurance Company, a foreign corporation. Judgment for defendant, error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendant in error was defendant, in the trial court; and this action was upon an alleged contract of insurance upon a growing crop of wheat, for loss sustained by hail pending an application for a policy; judgment being for the defendant upon the evidence. Plaintiff, on May 19, 1909, voluntarily applied to defendant for 'insurance by voluntarily approaching its agents and signing, without actual knowledge of its contents, an application in printed form furnished by defendant and prepared for signature by and in the hands of Joel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. NeafusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Winnesheik Insurance v. HolzgrafeIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. McClureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Security Ins. Co. of New Haven v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kukuska v. Home Mutual Hail-Tornado InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Zayc v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Munhall v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.