Legal Opinion

In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2011No. 2:07-cv-01871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

RUFE, District Judge.

This MDL action arises from injuries allegedly suffered by patients who were prescribed Avandia — an FDA-approved diabetes medication. In 2007, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred thousands of individual cases to this Court for consolidated pretrial proceedings. The cases allege that Avandia (and its sister drugs Avandamet and Avandaryl) cause an increased risk of heart attack, heart failure, and other physical injury, and that manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) failed to adequately warn of those risks. 1…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DiBartolo v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Trisvan v. HeymanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  3. Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Ideus v. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  5. COHEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API