Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Co. v. Gonzales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1978No. B-6707PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

Ramon Gonzales sued Bristol-Myers Company, the Upjohn Company, and Dr. Rufino Gonzalez for deafness resulting from administration by Dr. Gonzalez of Bristol-Myers’ Kantrex and Upjohn’s neomycin. Bristol-Myers and Upjohn were sued in strict liability for improper warnings, and Dr. Gonzalez was sued in negligence for improper treatment. Shortly before the trial, plaintiff Gonzales entered into a settlement agreement with Dr. Gonzalez and non-suited both Dr. Gonzalez and Upjohn. 1 Dr. Gonzalez remained in the case as a third party defendant to Bristol-Myers’ claim for indemnity…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palestine Contractors, Inc. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Martinez v. Delta Brands, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Crocker v. Winthrop Laboratories, Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API