Legal Opinion

COHEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00057Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RANDI COHEN AND JAMES COHEN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) 2:20-cv-00057 ) v. ) Judge Mark R. Hornak ) JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION Mark R. Hornak, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs Randi and James Cohen (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this personal injury, products liability civil action against Defendants’ Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Defendants”)1 alleging a variety of injuries and complications arising from the implantation of Defendants’ Gynemesh pelvic mesh device. On…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API