COHEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RANDI COHEN AND JAMES COHEN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) 2:20-cv-00057 ) v. ) Judge Mark R. Hornak ) JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION Mark R. Hornak, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs Randi and James Cohen (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this personal injury, products liability civil action against Defendants’ Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Defendants”)1 alleging a variety of injuries and complications arising from the implantation of Defendants’ Gynemesh pelvic mesh device. On…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.