Legal Opinion

Meisenhelder v. Byram

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1929No. 27,515PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict for $21,500.

Plaintiff’s decedent, Glen G. McGill, was a head brakeman on one of defendants’ freight trains. At Fairfax, Iowa, as it came to a stop, he uncoupled the train between the second and third cars. Perhaps this was done before the train came to a standstill. It was unknown to the engineer. A very few moments thereafter the engineer backed the front part of the train, and Mr. McGill was caught by the couplers between the second and third cars and fatally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burho v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Davis v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Popplar v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Stemper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Meisenhelder v. ByramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API