Legal Opinion

Burho v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1913No. Nos. 17,912—(74)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $40,000 for personal injury. The facts and the substance of tbe complaint and answer are stated in tbe opinion. Tbe reply denied that tbe accident was due to plaintiff’s failure to exercise proper care for bis •own safety or that plaintiff assumed the danger of such an accident.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $40,000 for personal injury. The facts and the substance of tbe complaint and answer are stated in tbe opinion. Tbe reply denied that tbe accident was due to plaintiff’s failure to exercise proper care for bis •own safety or that plaintiff assumed the danger of such an accident. The case was tried before Dickson, J., who denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict of $24,750 in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict or for a new…

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries received through the negligence of the defendant. the verdict was for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment in its favor, or, in case of a denial thereof, for a new trial.

Plaintiff alleged that on April 14, 1911, be as brakeman, was in the employ of the defendant, a railway company engaged in interstate commerce. On that day be was injured on the defendant’s tracks at Waseca, Minnesota, while at work upon one of its interstate commerce freight trains under these alleged circumstances, in brief: As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Nichols v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phillabaum v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Darrel Coleman v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Reetz v. Chicago & ER Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  4. Thoreson v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Central of Georgia Railroad v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API