Legal Opinion

Mickens v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1991No. 70A01-9104-PC-94PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This appeal calls on us to review the pleading requirements the State must adhere to in post-conviction proceedings to raise a successful defense of waiver or res judicata. Specifically, petitioner-appellant Carl Mickens asks us to reverse the post-conviction court's conclusion that a 1981 jury properly determined him to be an habitual offender.

Mickens was convicted in 1981 of burglary, a Class B felony 1 , and of being an habitual offender. 2 Both convictions were affirmed on direct appeal to our supreme court. Mickens v. State (1982), Ind., 439 N.E.2d 591 (Wickens I). In 1988,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Biggs v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Schiro v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Mickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Robertson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Sewell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API