Legal Opinion

Sewell v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1992No. 02A03-9110-PC-329PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Jesse Sewell appeals the denial of his post-conviction discovery motions. He presents two issues for our review:

I. Whether the trial court erroneously refused to order the release of State’s Exhibit 4 (a “rape kit”) for laboratory examination and potential subjection to DNA testing.

II. Whether the trial court erroneously refused Sewell’s motion to examine laboratory reports compiled by a State witness.

We reverse.

On December 22, 1981, Sewell was found guilty of rape, a Class B felony. 1 The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, sufficient evidence having been established by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dabbs v. VergariNew York Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. BrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. David Pannell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API