Mickens v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
When the State argues waiver in a post-conviction proceeding but prevails on other grounds, must it file a cross-appeal in order to preserve its waiver argument when answering petitioner's appeal? For nearly two decades the answer has been yes. See Johnson v. State (1974), 262 Ind. 183, 313 N.E.2d 542. Our 1990 amendments to Indiana Trial Rule 59(G), however, have superseded Johnson. The State can now argue waiver in its appellee's brief without first filing a cross-appeal, so long as it affirmatively presented waiver in the post-conviction court.
Petitioner-appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Mickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Mickens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Bunch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- INB Banking Co. v. Opportunity Options, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. EubanksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.