Legal Opinion
BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2010No. 08-6140PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
In 2005, we affirmed a grant of partial summary judgment for Lexmark International (“Lexmark”) in a suit brought by Lexmark’s one-time partners, BDT Products and Buro-Datentechnik GMBH & Company KG (hereinafter collectively “BDT”), arising from the contention that Lexmark had misappropriated trade secrets in developing a printer tray that substantially resembled a tray developed by BDT. Among the firms appearing for BDT were Higgs, Fletcher & Mack (“Higgs”) and Meisenheimer Herron & Steele (“Meisenheimer”). Following our ruling, the district court granted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Todd Mattox v. Adam EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Metz v. Unizan BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Donald Freed v. Michelle ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Mike CoffeltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.