Legal Opinion
Sarsfield v. Citimortgage, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 20, 2010No. Civil 1:09-CV-00835PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Citimortgage, Inc.’s (“Citimortgage”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Neil and Shelly Sarsfield’s amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 36.) Specifically, Citimortage asserts that Plaintiffs’ state law claims are barred either by the gist of the action doctrine or the economic loss doctrine, and that Plaintiffs’ federal Truth-in-Lending claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The parties have briefed the issues, and the matter is ripe for…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Diodato v. Wells Fargo Insurance Services, USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Doll v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Montanez v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Tubman v. USAA Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.