Legal Opinion
Grier v. Ferrant
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1944No. Civ. 14150PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by reason of the negligence and carelessness of defendant Joe Ferrant, his agents, servants and employees. Also joined as a defendant was American Fidelity and Casualty Co., Inc., a corporation, the insurer of defendant Ferrant, who was doing business as Yellow Cab Company in the city of Burbank, Los Angeles County. The liability of such corporate defendant was predicated upon the issuance by it of a policy of insurance to defendant Ferrant pursuant to an ordinance of the city of Burbank. Following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sanchez v. Pacific Auto StagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Fraher v. EisenmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Connell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.