Legal Opinion
United States v. Gray-Burriss
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 2017No. Criminal No. 2010-0178PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
After a four-week jury trial, Defendant Caleb Gray-Burriss was convicted of embezzling over two hundred thousand dollars from the National Association of Special Police and Security Officers (“NASPSO”), a union of private security guards that he was entrusted with managing. He appealed his conviction to the D.C. Circuit, arguing that his two trial counsel were ineffective for a variety of reasons, including their failure to present crucial witness testimony and general lack of preparedness. He. also challenged the trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Caleb Gray-BurrissCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Maranda ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Gray-BurrissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. MichelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.