Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray-Burriss

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 5, 2020No. Criminal No. 2010-0178Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, v. Case No. 10-cr-00178 (CRC) CALEB GRAY-BURRISS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Caleb Gray-Burriss, proceeding pro se, filed a “Motion Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence” on April 13, 2020. See Motion to Vacate, ECF. No. 313. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion. I. Background A. Factual and Procedural History This Court and the D.C. Circuit have laid out the factual and procedural background in this case in several prior opinions. See United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. Caleb Gray-BurrissCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. KingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. United States v. Caleb Gray-BurrissCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Gray-BurrissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API