Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Allied Fairbanks Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
Appellant, Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co., challenges the trial court’s reformation of a deed of trust and a promissory note. Because appellant was not a party nor a third party beneficiary of these contracts, we hold that appellant has no standing to contest the trial court’s judgment which granted reformation. We affirm the judgment of the court below.
In 1972, Rex N. Smuts and K.W. McDowell executed several notes with appellee, Allied Fairbanks Bank, for the purpose of financing the construction of houses. In 1973, Smuts and McDowell defaulted on the notes. As…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cantrell v. BroadnaxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Graham v. TurcotteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Campagna v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Sims v. HaggardTexas Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by31 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Mandell v. Hamman Oil and Refining Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Temple EasTex, Inc. v. Old Orchard Creek Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. GaskampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.