Cantrell v. Broadnax
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
This controversy between the parties involves the ownership of a wooden structure after its removal to Lots 3, 4 and S, Block A/6095, Honey Springs Addition to the City of Dallas, and placement upon temporary piling or underpinning. At close of testimony on trial to a jury the court ruled that no questions of fact had been raised, granting peremptory instructions as follows: In favor of Pate against Cantrell for $500; that the building was the property of Broadnax; and denying all other prayers for relief by way of cross-action, etc. To such rulings defendant Cantrell gave…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Nine Hundred Main, Inc. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Upham Gas Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Grindstaff v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Zerr v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
3Cited by24 opinions
- Reames v. Hawthorne-Seving, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Allied Fairbanks BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Groves v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Dubin v. Carrier Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,017 Linda Dedmon, Etc. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., Third-Party and v. Donald Hampton, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.