Legal Opinion

Henry v. Garden City Bank & Tr. Co. of San Jose

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1904No. S.F. No. 3387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The court below sustained the demurrer to the second amended complaint, and, the plaintiff declining to further amend, judgment was entered accordingly, and in favor of the defendant, from which this appeal is taken. The complaint consists of two counts. In the first it is alleged that one Murphy, being the owner of a certain tract of land situate in the county of San Luis Obispo, executed a mortgage to the plaintiff October 1, 1895, to secure the sum of thirty thousand dollars, with interest; that subsequently— to wit, February 16, 1897—said Murphy executed a second mortgage to the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McPike v. HeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Angus v. PlumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quinn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Garcia v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. William Ede Co. v. HeywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. William Ede Co. v. HeywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API