Legal Opinion

William Ede Co. v. Heywood

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1908No. S.F. No. 4842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll alone from the judgment in favor of the defendants.

The action is to recover money alleged to have been paid by the plaintiff to the use of the defendants. The facts are as follows: On the first Monday of March, 1905, the defendant William B. Pleywood was the owner and holder of a duly recorded mortgage on certain land in San Francisco, and on that date the taxes for that year on his interest as such mortgagee became a lien on the said interest (Pol. Code, sec. 3718). This interest for purposes of taxation is an interest in the land (Const., art. XIII,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Anderson v. YoakumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McPike v. HeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Angus v. PlumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Henry v. Garden City Bank & Tr. Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fraser v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Garcia v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Maywood Mutual Water Co. No. 2 v. City of MaywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. McEntyre v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API