Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Quinn v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Butler Brothers is a Minnesota corporation, with an office in Ramsey county and one in Itasca county. The individual defendants own all the stock in that corporation. An appearance was made in this case by all the defendants except Cooley Butler, who resides in the state of California.

The action was commenced and the complaint and a notice of lis pendens were filed in Itasca county. John Butler resides in St. Louis county, and Walter and Emmett Butler live in Ramsey county. All the defendants except Cooley joined in a demand for a change of the place of trial from Itasca to. Ramsey county,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. D. S. B. Johnston Land Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Henry v. Garden City Bank & Tr. Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Quinn v. Butler BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. W. B. Foshay Co. v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Wrabek v. TifftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API