Legal Opinion

McPike v. Heaton

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1900No. S.F. No. 1463PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendant was the owner of the undivided half of a certain tract of land in Alameda county on the first Monday of March, 1897, and for many years prior thereto, and on March 24, 1897, he made a grant, bargain, and sale deed of his interest in the land to one Jackson. On the next day Jackson conveyed the land to the plaintiffs by a grant, bargain, and sale deed, and the plaintiffs have since remained the owners thereof. The land was assessed to the defendant for the purposes of revenue for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1897, and taxes were levied thereon for that year by the city of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lawrence v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nippon Credit Bank, Ltd. v. 1333 N. Cal. BoulevardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Soderberg v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brinton v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Babb v. WeemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Garcia v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API