Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLEARY, Chief Judge
On appeal from the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of respondent-employer Lifetouch National School Studios Inc. (Lifetouch), appellant-employee John J. Capistrant argues that the district court erred by (1) granting summary judgment in favor of Lifetouch based on impermissible factual determinations, (2) enforcing a forfeiture clause in a non-compete agreement, absent harm to Lifetouch, and (3) failing to determine the correct method of calculating the residual commission due under the employment contract’s non-compete agreement. The district court did…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Mesabi Metallics Co. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (In re Essar Steel Minn. LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018