Lusk v. Hitt
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.
This bill was filed to collect from the trustee $236.12, balance of the proceeds of sale of a house and lot in Tiilla-homa under a foreclosure of the deed of trust, claimed to be exempt under the homestead laws, which proceeds were sought to be impounded by Ewin Coop a creditor in a garnishment proceeding. The creditor Coop filed an answer and cross-bill denying that complainant was the head of a family and entitled to the proceeds, and insisted that the proceeds should be subjected to the payment of his debt, (1) because it was impounded by garnishment, and (2) because his debt was for money…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. FulghumTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Milam v. MilamTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Loftis v. LoftisTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Jackson, Orr & Co. v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Hall v. FulghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Code v. LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Dysart v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929