Legal Opinion

White v. Fulghum

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1889PublishedCited by 28 opinions

FROM CHEATHAM. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Cheatham County. Geo. E. Seay, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is a hill to marshal securities. Defendant J. H. Fulghum and his wife executed a mortgage upon a tract of land on which they resided to secure a debt of $1,500 to the mortgagee, ¥m. Greer.

Thereafter other creditors of Fulghum, with judgments before Justices of the Peace' and executions thereon returned nulla bona, filed their hill in chancery to foreclose the mortgage by a sale of the land, and to subject the surplus proceeds to the payment of their debts. Foreclosure was refused, because the mortgage had not matured and, the mortgagee refused to consent to a sale; hut the Chancellor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dickson v. ChornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Nolan v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re SivleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  4. Kerens National Bank v. StocktonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dogan, Sheriff v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API