Milam v. Milam
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson Connty. — Jas. B. Newman, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
delivered the opinion of the Court.. The hill of complaint was filed to enforce a lien upon realty for the repayment of a sum advanced by complainant toward its purchase.
Robert M. Milam, the son of complainant, Ellen C. Milam, married, and he and his young wife were de-*688sirons of purchasing a home in one of the best residential sections of the city of Nashville. He had only $1,700”, and the property they preferred would cost approximately $7,000. Complainant advanced the difference, paying the sum to the owner vendor, Ogden, under an agreement with her son and daughter that she was to have a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leary v. . CorvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Westall v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dixon v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Nelson v. Nelson Neal Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
- Ralph Rogers & Company, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Cumberland Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Waldschmidt v. Dennis (In Re Muller)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.