Legal Opinion

Loftis v. Loftis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1895PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM JACKSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Jackson County. B. M. Webb, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

There is a multiplicity of pleadings in these consolidated causes, which it is not necessary to notice critically. The cause as finally presented is a proceeding to wind up the estate of H. P. Loftis as an insolvent estate, to sell his lands for the payment of his debts, to declare the rights of . his widow and children and the creditors of the estate, and fix their priorities inter sene in the assets of the estate, consisting now entirely of the proceeds of real estate, a small amount of personal property, less than $100, having already been consumed in the payment of burial expenses.

It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eyster v. HathewayIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Smith v. . HighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Fox v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Williams v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wallace v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Sheafer v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wilhelm v. LocklarSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. Guardianship of Kimble v. DaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Cummings v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API