Legal Opinion

State v. Maag

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 16, 1979No. 78-1000-M, CA 13265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation. The question presented is whether defendant’s probation may be revoked for conduct which did not violate a condition of probation fixed by the sentencing judge at the time of sentencing, but was fixed by defendant’s probation officer subsequent to sentencing. We hold that it may not, and reverse.

While the sentencing judge has substantial leeway in determining conditions of probation, the conditions must be fixed by the court.1 ORS 137.540(1). State v. Hovater, 37 Or App 557, 588 P2d 56 (1978); State v. Age, 38 Or App 501, 590 P2d 759…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. HovaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KelemenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. Rivera-WaddleLane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Dean v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API