Legal Opinion

State v. Pike

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1980No. 76-3576, CA 16401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his probation and executing the sentence previously imposed for assault in the second degree. He argues that of the four grounds alleged for revocation of probation in the amended order to show cause, two did not provide a legal basis for revocation and the other two were not proven.

The order of probation entered by the court after defendant’s conviction of assault established three conditions of probation: (1) that defendant violate no laws; (2) that defendant carry out all rules and regulations established for him by the Corrections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. MaagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Bell v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaavedraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. Rivera-WaddleLane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API