State v. Kelemen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
*186*1226Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation. The trial court revoked defendant's probation after finding that, by failing to comply with his probation officer's repeated directives to complete work crew, defendant violated the statutorily required general condition of his probation requiring him to "[r]eport as required and abide by the direction of the supervising officer." ORS 137.540(1)(m). In view of our recent opinion in State v. Hardges , 294 Or. App. 445, 432 P.3d 268 (2018), we conclude that the court's revocation decision was based on a mistaken understanding of ORS…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. Rivera-WaddleLane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. HardgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. MaagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.