Dean v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
The district court dismissed this § 1983 suit, holding it barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion. Because we agree that collateral estoppel bars the suit, we affirm the dismissal. We do not reach the district court’s alternative holding that it was required to abstain from exercising jurisdiction under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). As the facts are known to the parties, we discuss them here only as necessary to explain our decision.
On August 5, 2000, Dean filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking compensatory and punitive damages,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Douglas Miller v. County of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.