Legal Opinion
Deas v. Diaz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 2010No. AC 31143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant Transportation General, Inc., doing business as Metro Taxi (Metro), 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its motions for remittitur and to set aside the jury verdict, which had been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Jermaine D. Deas. On appeal, Metro claims that the court improperly denied (1) its motions for remittitur or to set aside the verdict when the jury verdict was excessive and (2) its motion to set aside the verdict when (a) the court made an incorrect evidentiary ruling and (b) the jury failed to follow the court’s instructions…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Johnson v. PikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. McLarenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Deas v. DiazConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Deas v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010