Legal Opinion

State v. McLaren

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 8, 2011No. AC 30065PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The defendant, Lloyd McLaren, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) his sixth amendment right to confrontation was violated when the prosecutor disclosed an extrajudicial testimonial statement made by an individual absent from trial and (2) the prosecutor engaged in prosecutorial impropriety that deprived the defendant of a fair trial. We agree with the defendant’s second claim that he was deprived of a fair trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. UbaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2026
  3. State v. O'Brien-VeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API