Legal Opinion
Lobdell v. Broome County Farmers' Fire Relief Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Senn,
Official Referee. The defendant is a co-operative fire insurance company, duly organized and carrying on business in the county of Broome on the assessment plan. On March 25, 1932, on the written application of Carlton Tallmadge, it issued to him its policy whereby it agreed to insure him against all direct loss or damage by fire (except as otherwise in the policy provided), from that time to March 25, 1935, in an amount not exceeding $4,615. It covered farm buildings in the town of Sanford and certain personal property, and, among other things, stated: “ Loss if any ‘ should occur…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cornell v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Cornell v. . Travelers' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Lloyd v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Seely v. Tioga County Patrons Fire Relief Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Orwat v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baysdon v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Seward Park Housing Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Herschman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of BostonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936