Legal Opinion
Orwat v. Ætna Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
This action is to recover for damages caused by-fire under a policy of insurance issued by defendant. At the close of the trial there was no disputed question of fact for the jury, so the case was submitted to the court for decision.
On November 1, 1926, the plaintiff Mary Orwat owned, in fee, the premises known as No. 218 Orlando street in the city of Buffalo, N. Y., consisting of a lot' thirty by one hundred and ten and one-half feet and the buildings thereon. In the front was a two-flat frame building, and in the rear a frame cottage. These buildings were firmly connected with each other by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Post & Dowding v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- Cornell v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Cornell v. . Travelers' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Dobson v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seward Park Housing Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Canales v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Lobdell v. Broome County Farmers' Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1934