Legal Opinion

Herschman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 31, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The outcome of this non-jury trial is dependent upon a construction of what is known as a “ total disability ” clause in a policy heretofore issued by defendant on the life of a former husband of plaintiff, since deceased. On October 25, 1922, defendant issued its policy to amount of $2,000 on life of one Felix Herschman, the beneficiary being his then wife, the plaintiff. On or about January 1, 1932, the assured became so ill as to warrant a classification of total permanent disability. He was obliged to relinquish the practice of his profession as a dentist and up to his death on November…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Cornell v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Cornell v. . Travelers' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Finucane v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  2. Mutchnick v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  3. Landry v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
  4. Morton v. Washington National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API