Herschman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The outcome of this non-jury trial is dependent upon a construction of what is known as a “ total disability ” clause in a policy heretofore issued by defendant on the life of a former husband of plaintiff, since deceased. On October 25, 1922, defendant issued its policy to amount of $2,000 on life of one Felix Herschman, the beneficiary being his then wife, the plaintiff. On or about January 1, 1932, the assured became so ill as to warrant a classification of total permanent disability. He was obliged to relinquish the practice of his profession as a dentist and up to his death on November…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Cornell v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Cornell v. . Travelers' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Finucane v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Birnbaum v. Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
- Mutchnick v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Landry v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
- Morton v. Washington National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949