Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hinkson
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 14, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-280-CMWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) brought this action on June 20, 1986 to recover monies defendants Richard Ford Hinkson and William Uffelman allegedly owe FDIC. Jurisdiction for the suit is based upon 12 U.S.C. § 1819 (1982). FDIC seeks repayment from Hinkson and Uffelman based upon documents signed by them on September 14, 1973 and on February 18, 1975. Now before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. FACTS
On September 14, 1973, the Walters Bluff Corporation borrowed $400,000…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
- United States v. CardinalDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Aronow Roofing Company v. Gilbane Building CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Valencia Pork Store, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988