Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hinkson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 6, 1988No. 87-3605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.*

In this case, a federal agency — assignee of a note — filed suit after the federal statute of limitations had lapsed but within the time allowed by state law. The district court entered summary judgment against the agency. We hold that in pursuing a viable claim, a federal agency is bound by the terms of the federal statute of limitations, which may not be lengthened or shortened by a state enactment. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.

The facts in this case are few and uncomplicated. Defendants executed a note in favor of the Farmer’s Bank of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API