Hunter v. Bryant
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing to vacate said judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaeoutte, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment and also from the order of the trial court denying a motion to set aside the default and judgment taken against the appellants, John L. Koster and H. Blagemann.
1. The appeal from the judgment is based upon the contention that the original .complaint did not state a cause of action. Conceding for the purposes of the case that the original com*250plaint was lacking in essentials, still the amended complaint is unobjectionable, and that is the pleading upon which the judgment was rendered. Admitting that material matters are set out in the amended complaint which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Buell v. EmerichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Garrison v. McGowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Cochran v. JewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Chambers v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Nielsen v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.