Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Jewell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1886No. 9365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract alleged to have been made on the twenty-fourth day of November, 1882, for the sale and delivery to plaintiff of ninety-seven bales of hops weighing 14,596 pounds, at the price of eighty cents per pound.

The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff for $2,189.40, on which judgment was entered. The defendant moved for a new trial, and the plaintiff was required by the court to remit from his judgment $729.40, and having done so, the motion was denied. The defendant then appealed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bryan v. Superior Court in and for of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hunter v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API