Legal Opinion

Buell v. Emerich

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1890No. 13530PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County setting aside and vacating a judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This action was brought to recover the value of certain personal property, alleged to have been owned by the plaintiff, and to have been unlawfully converted by the defendant to his own use. The answer denied each and every allegation of the complaint. On the eighth day of July, 1889, the case was set for trial on *117the fifteenth day of August following. On the last-named day the case was tried, neither the defendant nor his attorney being present in court, and judgment was given for the plaintiff. On the twenty-sixth day of the same month, the defendant served and filed notice of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Roland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Cameron v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Dougherty v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Mitchell v. Cal. & Or. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Moore v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Pittock v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API