Legal Opinion

State v. . Morrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The following excerpt taken from the charge forms the basis of one of the defendant’s exceptive assignments of error:

“Tbe court tells you that, receiving stolen goods, knowing them to bave been stolen, means exactly wbat tbe language implies; taking into one’s possession tbe goods, wares, and chattels of another, knowing at tbe time of such taking that tbe goods were stolen, or under such circumstances as would put a reasonably prudent man on notice that such goods are stolen.”

It will be observed tbe indictment charges tbe defendant with “feloni-ously” receiving stolen goods,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CavenessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . SpainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. . EuniceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. . BethelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. BarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API