Legal Opinion
State v. . Morrison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The following excerpt taken from the charge forms the basis of one of the defendant’s exceptive assignments of error:
“Tbe court tells you that, receiving stolen goods, knowing them to bave been stolen, means exactly wbat tbe language implies; taking into one’s possession tbe goods, wares, and chattels of another, knowing at tbe time of such taking that tbe goods were stolen, or under such circumstances as would put a reasonably prudent man on notice that such goods are stolen.”
It will be observed tbe indictment charges tbe defendant with “feloni-ously” receiving stolen goods,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . CavenessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . SpainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . EuniceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . BethelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.