Legal Opinion

State v. . Eunice

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Tbe chief exception is to tbe failure of bis Honor to properly charge tbe jury. In tbe beginning of bis charge tbe trial judge instructed tbe jury that: “In order to convict him tbe law places tbe burden on tbe State to satisfy you beyond a reasonable doubt that be is guilty as charged in tbe bill of indictment.” Tbe judge then proceeds to array fully tbe contentions of tbe State and tbe defendant, and concludes as follows: “You will take tbe ease and consider it, consider all tbe evidence in tbe case, whether I have called it to your attention or not. You are sensible men. Take this evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. State v. . KirklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Blake v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. State v. . CoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. HairrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. . DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. State v. DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API