Legal Opinion

Heppe v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1887No. 11785PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

On the twenty-first day of February, 1873, a decree of foreclosure was entered in the District Court in and for Sacramento County, in favor of Nicholas Schadt against William Nicholas Heppe, administrator of the estate of Jacob Heppe, deceased, and others. This decree, among other things, provided:—

“ That if there be any surplus after the payment of the moneys due plaintiff, with interest, attorneys’ fees, costs, and accruing costs, that such surplus be paid into court, to be disposed of under the order of the court to the persons entitled thereto.”

In pursuance of the decree,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. People v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Moreing v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Harris v. Northwestern National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API