Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkpatrick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1988No. 8715SC864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Under his sole assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in increasing defendant’s sentence on resen-tencing from three years to fifteen years, relying on N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1335 (1983), which is as follows:

Resentencing after appellate review. Where a conviction or sentence imposed in superior court has been set aside on direct review or collateral attack, the court may not impose a new sentence for the same offense, or for a different offense based on the same conduct, which is more severe than the prior sentence ....

We disagree.

While G.S. § 15A-1335…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API