Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1986No. 868SC337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

We have carefully considered defendant’s first, second, and fourth assignments of error. We find no prejudicial error in any of them and accordingly overrule them.

In his third assignment of error defendant contends the court erred in sentencing him in a separate judgment and commitment as an habitual felon in violation of G.S. 14-7.1 because being an habitual felon is not a substantive crime. We agree.

In State v. Allen, 292 N.C. 431, 435, 233 S.E. 2d 585, 588 (1977), our Supreme Court stated:

The only reason for establishing that an accused is an habitual felon is to enhance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. TyndallNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LedwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. PenlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API